Bisphosphonates & Avandia - Drugs Meant to Heal May Actually Cause Harm!

Rate it!

Currently 3 /5 Stars.
1
2
3
4
5

15 comments View Comments Post a Comment

According to Daniel Carpenter, a government professor at Harvard who is an expert on the drug agency, What is of concern today is that the drugs prescribed for chronic health problems, are suddenly showing up to be causing problems on continual use. Even drug companies have had a shift in thinking. They see a market of ageing people with chronic diseases. As most of the chronic diseases are due to life style problems, the focus has shifted to big markets for drugs as they needed be taken by a large part of the population lifelong, a long haul for every drug. On the flip side all drug benefits and side effects noted are based on short-term studies, and thus may turn out to be erroneous on prolonged use The ethical committees for drug use are now getting worried as drugs proven beneficial for short term use are now proving to be challenging when used for chronic, long term problems and who can be faulted for that?

In this context an expert on Osteoporosis -Dr Ethel Siris who believes that after extended studies she sees bisphosphonates as an excellent solution for preventing fractures in osteoporotic people. She is concerned that people will unfortunately weigh the extreme rare conditions of thigh fractures and jaw disease against the benefits it offers. How does one react to the turn of events?

Finally what rankles in ones mind is the irony of it all! “Of drugs causing what they were supposed to prevent”

Vijayalakshmi Iyengar
Sr Dietitian NutritionVista.com

NutritionVista

User Comments

25 April, 2011 | Vijayalakshmi Iyengar | Reply

Highly exciting news that scientists have developed a new injectable serum which will help ward off or beat osteoporosis by building new bones. This new shot (developed by a biotech company AMGEN along with their Belgian partner), is it will reduce the frequency of treatments for people who suffer from brittle bones and the associated pain. Till date the drugs used simply prevented the old bone from breaking down and they had to be taken on a daily basis, which was inconvenient. The new medicine given once a month or even once in 3 months, helps by binding sclerostin -a protein that slows down or blocks the building of new bone, and prevents it from acting.
A trial on 400 women who were given the `sclerostin antibody jab’, compared favorably with the existing drugs in the market. However a bigger study is on the cards to establish its safety and efficacy before its on sale.
However, recently The FDA has approved Forteo (teriparatide), a new daily injectable drug for osteoporosis that stimulates new bone formation. Forteo is a portion of human parathyroid hormone (PTH), which regulates calcium metabolism in bones.
Read more on osteoporosis on http://tinyurl.com/3dawlyq
Vijayalakshmi Iyengar
Sr.Dietitian
Nutritionvista.com

05 November, 2010 | Jan | Reply

I personally think people should have their hips, spine, jaw and any other painful or suspected bones evaluated before beginning a prescription of Fosamax to make sure they don't have a misalignment that could result in a fracture as the bones become stronger.
Some people may require starting with a pair of Orthotics in their shoes to realign their bones before trying to harden these bones. Hardening a bone quickly that is becoming thin and brittle inside due to pressure from misalignment could lead to fractures to people at an earlier time in their life than expected. That's my opinion. I've been walking around with minimal orthotic support. My one leg is shorter than the other, and this causes pain and pressure on my hip in the area indicated as causing fractures from using Fosamax. I just think if I took this pill before starting a strict use of orthotics, including a lift in the one shoe, and other means to keep my bones sraight, my right hip bone could easily become broken due to the damage that is already there.

26 October, 2010 | Virender Mehta | Reply

I completely agree with Naresh.its not possible to say whether drug is completely safe for use in just a limited trial period. To assess long term safety, post marketing surveillance by the drug manufacturing companies should be made compulsory by regulatory authorities.

26 October, 2010 | Naresh Verma | Reply

Drugs do undergo rigorous processes and trials before they are labelled as safe for use. However, all the adverse effects or toxicities cannot be elicited in the limited number of volunteers used in the phased trial. Drug regulatory bodies should be aware of these facts and take prompt initiatives to withdraw their sale if they are found unfit for long term use later.

25 October, 2010 | Mohit Verma | Reply

For many, drugs have become a necessity now a days and not a choice. I am sure that there must be many other drugs that are meant for treating serious disorders which might be future Avandias or biphosphonates. Its high time that medicine market should be regulated more stringently.

25 October, 2010 | Radhika Singh | Reply

We know it well that drugs can be put into clinical trial only for a particular period of time. However that should not mean that it is cent percent safe for use. There can be safety issues in long term use of particular drugs. So in my opinion, drugs, even when they are approved for use should be kept under study so as to know their long term efficacy and any harmful effect, if any.

26 October, 2010 | Aparna K T | Reply

After a certain period of time during the clinical trial for drugs when the team has sufficient data to conclude that it is going to alleviate the condition for which it has been produced and has been approved, the funds to continue the trial is limited. Therefore long term clinical trials are not conducted.

21 October, 2010 | Kanika Jain | Reply

Though stringent regulations or ban or label advisories have been issued for these drugs but as a consumer, recent episodes makes us think about few questions.
•Is it high time to tighten the clinical trials of drugs before they actually hit the market?
•Should there be new safety standards which pharmaceutical companies need to meet before getting approval from concerned agencies?
•What is the role of approval agencies? Should that be revised too?
•Should there be long term clinical trials even after a drug is approved to assess long term safety?
•What about those who have already been on these controversial drugs for years?
•What about many other drugs available in market being prescribed by doctors for other ailments whose long term safety has not yet been supported\contradicted by the research studies.
•Is it that greed of major pharmaceutical houses for huge profit is over- powering the benefit and welfare of patients concerned? If yes, should there be a watchdog panel to monitor practices of pharmaceutical companies too like fair clinical trials, responsible advertisement and selling of drugs?

21 October, 2010 | Sonika, R | Reply

Good!
The more we raise awareness on bisphosphonates the better.
Thanks

21 October, 2010 | Sunder Rajan | Reply

In India, I am sure both will be available on black market, even though they are banned. Govt has no say when compared to determined pharmacy's and companies.

21 October, 2010 | Dr. Sudershan Gupta | Reply

On World Osteoporosis day there were many activities and seminars all over N.Delhi, to awaken people about taking precautions to prevent Osteoporosis . Bisphosphonates is given to people to help them deal with the malady.
I have a couple of points to make
1.Not everybody who is on bisphosphonates have these strong side effects (thigh fracture or jaw disease)-Are we not overreacting ?
2. DO you have any alternatives right now for a person suffering from this malady?
Research articles are sometimes far removed from practical applications, we need not jump every time they have a new theory.

22 October, 2010 | Vijayalakshmi Iyengar | Reply

Dear Dr Gupta, Yes, I agree that we should not overreact when a research finding contraindicates use of a drug which is doing much good but some rare side effects are threatening its use.
However as you well know there is no way to be a 100 percent certain what the outcome with long term use will be. Meanwhile medical care dictates we must err on the side of caution.

Avandia is a classic example of a drug which seemed so effective in the treatment of diabetes, but on prolonged use began to cause serious problems.
Research findings help caution the doctor of possible side effects which he may or may not have encountered with till date and puts him and the patient on guard, watchful for any untoward reactions.
To answer your question on bisphophonates, as stated in the article an expert in osteoporosis, Dr Siris herself expressed fear that the drug which was an excellent remedy for preventing fractures in osteoporotic people, might unfortunately get vetoed against its use in the light of the extremely rare conditions of thigh fractures and jaw disease. So only time will tell if bisphophonates will stay or go the Avandia way.

Meanwhile, we dietitians will continue to advocate a nutrient rich diet and daily moderate exercise that will play a significant role in improving bone health.

Thank you for your insight - I am sure it is toughest for the physicians who have to take a call on whether to prescribe a drug or not.
Please do let me know if I could be of further help with regards to any diet and nutrition information.
Sincerely,
Mrs Vijayalakshmi Iyengar

21 October, 2010 | Maria Jose Rivera | Reply

These companies need to stop selling to all these people who do not know problems of these medications.

What to believe is the big question. How to trust a company who want to make profit form people suffering.

It is better eat healthy - less fat in food and less calories and beer and more fruits and vegetables. cooking at home is good.
Thanks

Also be informed of problems so you can avoid harmful medications.
Thank yo u.

22 October, 2010 | Mrinal | Reply

Dear Ms. Rivera,
From a patients point of view it could be upsetting that companies try and push a drug to market and later find out if it has any harmful side effects.

However, think of all the sick and infirm that benefit as well from this kind of research.

Yes, diet and exercise are great, but when the body already has an illness like osteoporosis or cancer or elevated blood pressure - drugs MUST come into play to correct the problem at the earliest or else the patient faces an escalation in his condition.

If you ever worry about a medication - please do talk to your doctor about your fears and concerns and follow his / her advise. Doctors are aware of these potential side effects and knowing your health history puts them in the best position to prescribe a drug or not for you.
Best wishes.

22 October, 2010 | Goel | Reply

Drug companies may make profits but drugs are a necessity, so dont always confuse the trees for the woods.
Good diet is most important but can you cure people after they get a disease with just a good diet & exercise and without drugs?

Post Comments

Contact Name:

E-mail:

(Will show your Gravatar icon)

Comments:

Notify me when new comments are added

User Rules

Dear User,

This is to inform you that this part of the site is moderated, and your comments will be published after the approval of the moderators. Your text comments can be modified or deleted at any time. All comments that are posted are moderated by paid employees to ensure appropriate behavior and monitor and prevent abuse and disrespect of users and readers. The moderators also ensure that all questions asked are forwarded to and responded by employees in a timely manner and by the appropriate and qualified employees. The moderators are the dietitians listed under "The NV Dietetic Team"

All users are by default considered as non medical professionals, unless explicitly stated. If you are a health professional giving medical information as a platform user, please list your status as a medical professional so as to be clearly identified.

Please note - We recommend you not include any personal data and will remove all advertising for a site or product.

All platform users and moderators must behave at all times with respect and honesty. If comments are inappropriate moderators may intervene and if a platform users is banned they will be warned or notified before being banned.

Please note regarding response time - The moderator’s is notified automatically with details the instant a comment is posted.

'The information provided on the NutritionVista.com website is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between a patient and his/her own physician.' The minimum age for the use or participation in these platforms is 18 years of age and is strictly adhered to. By posting a comment all users of this platform undertake to disseminate only information that is true and correct in light of their knowledge.

Tags: Cholesterol, Diabetes, Diabetes Management, Diabetes Prevention, Drugs, General health, Health Hazards, Healthy Lifestyle, Osteoporosis, Sedentary Lifestyle, Seniors Health, Speak Up, Type 2 Diabetes - Insulin Dependent Diabetes

© 2007 - 2024 NutritionVista.com. All rights reserved. A single copy of these materials may be reprinted for noncommercial personal use only. All articles and content written by the Nutritionvista.com team for NutritionVista.com are the sole property of J.L.S Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Content may not be copied without express permission to do so. If you want to link back to an article, please ensure a working link to the article title is used and is functioning at all times.